Saturday, July 9, 2011
Sunday, July 3, 2011
Hunger Strike at Pelican Bay SHU
The following letter was written by John R. Martinez, one of the  inmates in the Security Housing Unit at California's Pelican Bay State  Prison who began a hunger strike on July 1 to protest conditions in  solitary confinement. Written just before the strike commenced, the  letter is addressed to Governor Jerry Brown, Secretary of Corrections  and Rehabilitation Matthew Cate, and Pelican Bay Warden G.D. Lewis.
Gentlemen:
On July 1, 2011, I and my fellow prisoners – on  their own free will – will be commencing a hunger strike to protest the  denial of our human rights and equality via the use of perpetual  solitary confinement. The Supreme Court has referred to "solitary  confinement" as one of the techniques of "physical and mental torture"  that have been used by governments to coerce confessions (Chambers v.  Florida, 309 U.S. 227, 237-238 (1940)).
In regards to PBSP-SHU, Judge Thelton E. Henderson stated that "many  if not most, inmates in the SHU experience some degree of psychological  trauma in reaction to their extreme social isolation and the severely  restricted environmental stimulation in SHU" (Madrid v. Gomez, 889 F.  Supp. 1146, 1235 (N.D. Cal. 1995)). Not surprisingly, Judge Henderson  stated that "the conditions in the SHU may press the outer bounds of  what most humans can psychologically tolerate" and that sensory  deprivation found in the SHU "may well hover on the edge of what is  humanly tolerable for those with normal resilience" (Madrid, 889 F.  Supp. at 1267, 1280). Four years later, a Texas federal judge reviewed  conditions in isolation of a Texas prison that mirrored those of  PBSP-SHU. He correctly held:
"Before the court are levels of psychological deprivation that  violate the United States Constitution's prohibition against cruel and  unusual punishment. It has been shown that defendants are deliberately  indifferent to a systemic pattern of extreme social isolation and  reduced environmental stimulation. These deprivations are the cause of  cruel and unusual pain and suffering by inmates in administrative  segregation …" (Ruiz v. Johnson, 37 F. Supp. 2d 855, 914-915 (S.D.  Tex.1999)).
Thus solitary confinement, by its very nature, is harmful to human  beings, including prisoners,1 especially for those of us prisoners whose  isolation is perpetual based solely upon our status as an associate or  member of a gang. In theory, our detention is supposedly for  administrative "non-disciplinary" reasons. Yet, when I asked one of the  prison staff why is it we are not afforded the same privileges as those  gang affiliated inmates in a Level 4 general population (GP), I was told  that "according to Sacramento," we don't "have shit coming" and that it  is the department's "goal of breaking" us down. Thus, our treatment is  clearly punitive, discriminatory and coercive.
Further proof is provided by the fact that a member of a disruptive  group – i.e., a gang per CCR 3000 – who commits a violent assault on a  non-prisoner will receive three to five years in the SHU as punishment  and then be released back to the GP. Ironically, we on the other hand  receive way harsher treatment. We are subjected to the same disciplinary  SHU conditions. Worse yet, for an indeterminate term solely for who we  are or who we know. Not for violent or disruptive behavior.
Most of us have been in isolation for over 15 and 20 years. In most  cases, for simple possession of a drawing, address, greeting card and/or  other form of speech and association.
Unfortunately, some of my  fellow prisoners are not here with me today. The SHU has either driven  them to suicide,2 mental illness or becoming a Judas – i.e., informer –  to escape these cruel conditions, which occurred after the findings in  Madrid.
An oppressed people always have the right to rise up and protest  discrimination, oppression and injustice. The Martin Luther King era  reminds us of that. So does the Attica prisoner uprising. Those  prisoners in Attica acted out, not because they were "animals," but  because they were tired of getting treated worse than animals. There is  no difference with us. The only difference is that our protest is one of  non-violence. We are a civilized people that simply wish to be treated  as humans and with equality. Not subjected to punitive treatment year  after year, which is imposed with a desire to injure. As Justice  Thurgood Marshall eloquently stated:
"When the prison gates slam behind an inmate, he does not lose his  human quality, his mind does not become closed to ideas; his intellect  does not cease to feed on a free and open interchange of opinions; his  yearning for self-respect does not end; nor is his quest for  self-realization concluded. If anything, the needs for identity and  self-respect are more compelling in the dehumanizing prison environment …  It is the role of the First Amendment … to protect those precious  personal rights by which we satisfy such basic yearnings of the human  spirit" (Procunio v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 326, 428 (1974)).
Wherefore, I respectfully request that our reasonable demands  attached hereto be honored as soon as possible and that the bigotry and  persecution against us for who we are come to an end once and for all.
Respectfully submitted,
John R. Martinez
"Remember those in prison as if you were  their fellow prisoners and those who are mistreated as if you yourselves  were suffering." – Hebrews 13:3
cc: Family, friends and supporters
•
1. "Empirical research on solitary and supermax-like  confinement has consistently and unequivocally documented the harmful  consequences of living in these kinds of environments. "Studies  undertaken over four decades corroborate such an assertion. (Craig  Haney, "Mental health issues in long-term solitary and `supermax'  confinement" in crime and delinquency. Vol. 49, No. I, January 2003, pp.  124-156). See also, Amnesty International, Report on Torture, Penal  Coercion, 1983.
2. As Kevin Johnson reported in USA Today: California, which has the  largest state prison system in the nation, saw a total of 41 suicides  in 2006; of those suicides, 69 percent were in solitary confinement.  ("Inmate suicides linked to solitary," USA Today, Dec. 27, 2006.) Those  numbers have increased since then.
John R. Martinez can be reached at J-S2893, PBSP SHU, P.O. Box 7500, Crescent City, CA 95532
 
